FINAL DATA

PENNSYLVANIA CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE DATA
BY COUNTY OF RESIDENCE

February 1998
(Data in thousands)
NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

CountyCivilian
Labor
Force
Employ-
ment
Unem-
ployment
Rate of
Unem-
ployment
Adams 43.241.22.0 4.5
Allegheny 641.7613.128.7 4.5
Armstrong 31.829.12.8 8.8
Beaver 84.579.74.8 5.7
Bedford 24.722.81.9 7.7
Berks 183.0175.07.9 4.3
Blair 62.558.93.5 5.6
Bradford 28.326.61.6 5.8
Bucks 311.9299.212.6 4.0
Butler 83.879.34.5 5.3
Cambria 67.462.15.3 7.8
Cameron 2.72.50.2 8.0
Carbon 26.924.72.2 8.1
Centre 67.265.02.2 3.3
Chester 220.3213.66.6 3.0
Clarion 18.717.41.4 7.4
Clearfield 37.934.23.8 9.9
Clinton 16.815.31.5 9.1
Columbia 33.430.33.1 9.2
Crawford 40.938.62.4 5.8
Cumberland 119.1115.73.4 2.9
Dauphin 138.8133.94.9 3.5
Delaware 273.5262.311.2 4.1
Elk 18.017.10.9 5.1
Erie 139.0130.78.3 6.0
Fayette 57.051.55.5 9.7
Forest 1.61.40.2 12.3
Franklin 66.263.42.9 4.3
Fulton 6.96.50.4 6.4
Greene 16.414.91.5 9.2
Huntingdon 18.616.62.0 10.8
Indiana 38.335.13.2 8.3
Jefferson 21.920.21.8 8.0
Juniata 10.39.31.0 9.3
Lackawanna104.998.26.76.4
Lancaster241.0233.27.83.2
Lawrence40.037.12.97.3
Lebanon65.262.72.53.9
Lehigh152.4145.37.14.7
Luzerne156.5145.011.67.4
Lycoming58.053.74.37.4
McKean20.619.21.47.0
Mercer55.853.12.74.9
Mifflin22.320.81.56.7
Monroe49.745.83.97.9
Montgomery382.8369.513.43.5
Montour8.88.40.44.3
Northampton127.0121.25.84.6
Northumberland45.241.53.78.3
Perry24.022.91.14.6
Philadelphia638.0598.839.16.1
Pike17.116.01.16.3
Potter8.98.10.78.3
Schuylkill67.762.55.27.7
Snyder19.117.81.26.4
Somerset37.634.43.28.4
Sullivan2.52.30.28.7
Susquehanna18.917.61.36.9
Tioga19.618.21.47.2
Union18.617.80.84.5
Venango25.624.01.76.5
Warren20.419.31.15.3
Washington94.388.46.06.3
Wayne17.215.41.710.0
Westmoreland179.8168.411.46.3
Wyoming15.313.81.59.9
York193.9186.37.63.9

ALL DATA ARE ON 1997 BENCHMARKS.
Rate computed using unrounded data and may not add to totals due to rounding.
SOURCE: Bureau of Research and Statistics, Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: LABOR FORCE DATA BEGINNING JANUARY 1994 ARE NOT COMPARABLE TO EARLIER DATA DUE TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REVISED SURVEY METHOD BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.


<--Return to Labor Force Index