PRELIMINARY DATA

PENNSYLVANIA CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE DATA
BY COUNTY OF RESIDENCE

May 1998
(Data in thousands)
NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED

CountyCivilian
Labor
Force
Employ-
ment
Unem-
ployment
Rate of
Unem-
ployment
Adams 44.843.11.7 3.8
Allegheny 646.7620.726.0 4.0
Armstrong 31.829.82.0 6.2
Beaver 84.780.74.0 4.7
Bedford 25.224.11.2 4.6
Berks 185.6177.87.8 4.2
Blair 63.160.03.1 4.9
Bradford 28.927.71.3 4.3
Bucks 313.7302.311.4 3.6
Butler 83.680.33.3 3.9
Cambria 67.963.64.3 6.3
Cameron 2.62.50.2 6.2
Carbon 26.524.81.8 6.7
Centre 67.065.41.5 2.3
Chester 221.7215.95.8 2.6
Clarion 18.918.00.9 4.8
Clearfield 38.435.53.0 7.7
Clinton 16.715.71.0 6.2
Columbia 32.430.91.5 4.7
Crawford 41.339.51.9 4.6
Cumberland 121.6118.43.1 2.6
Dauphin 141.2137.14.1 2.9
Delaware 276.1265.011.1 4.0
Elk 18.117.20.9 4.8
Erie 139.0131.87.2 5.2
Fayette 55.652.23.4 6.2
Forest 1.71.60.1 6.7
Franklin 67.064.72.3 3.4
Fulton 6.86.60.2 3.1
Greene 16.214.91.3 8.0
Huntingdon 18.817.51.3 7.0
Indiana 38.436.02.4 6.3
Jefferson 22.321.01.4 6.1
Juniata 10.710.00.7 6.2
Lackawanna106.2100.16.15.8
Lancaster247.4240.46.92.8
Lawrence40.138.12.05.1
Lebanon66.664.22.53.7
Lehigh152.4145.86.64.3
Luzerne157.1147.89.35.9
Lycoming57.954.83.15.3
McKean21.019.51.57.3
Mercer56.554.22.34.1
Mifflin22.521.31.35.6
Monroe49.145.93.26.6
Montgomery385.7373.312.43.2
Montour9.08.80.22.7
Northampton127.2121.65.74.5
Northumberland45.743.12.65.6
Perry24.223.40.83.3
Philadelphia644.6605.139.56.1
Pike17.116.30.74.2
Potter8.78.10.67.1
Schuylkill67.963.74.26.1
Snyder19.318.60.83.9
Somerset37.335.32.05.4
Sullivan2.72.60.14.7
Susquehanna19.118.20.94.6
Tioga20.219.11.15.3
Union19.118.50.73.4
Venango25.824.61.24.6
Warren20.719.90.83.9
Washington94.489.54.95.2
Wayne18.517.41.05.6
Westmoreland179.2170.58.74.8
Wyoming15.014.01.06.6
York194.1186.97.23.7

ALL DATA ARE ON 1997 BENCHMARKS.
Rate computed using unrounded data and may not add to totals due to rounding.
SOURCE: Bureau of Research and Statistics, Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: LABOR FORCE DATA BEGINNING JANUARY 1994 ARE NOT COMPARABLE TO EARLIER DATA DUE TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF REVISED SURVEY METHOD BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.